An increasing death rate for motorcyclists has sparked renewed debate over helmet laws. Safety advocates say such laws save lives and money, but bikers who oppose the laws say they represent a threat to personal freedom.
As motorcycles have become more nimble and powerful, stuntriding has gained in popularity. "Stunters" acknowledge that what they do is dangerous, but they say their sport is moving off the street and into arenas and other venues where traffic isn't an issue and medical services are close at hand.
Motorcyclists who oppose helmet laws say helmets impair vision and hearing and can make riding a motorcycle more dangerous. But studies overwhelmingly show that requiring bikers to wear a helmet reduces medical costs.
There's an overwhelming variety of motorcycle helmets out there, but focusing on some essential criteria makes it easier to narrow the field. Above all, don't forget to look for that DOT sticker on the back.
If you ride a motorcycle, you're 37 times more likely to die in a crash than someone in a passenger car. Motorcycle deaths have more than doubled in the past 10 years, and motorcycle accidents kill more Americans each year than all the nation's much higher-profile plane crashes, ship disasters, pipeline explosions and railway accidents combined.
Government officials will tell you that motorcyclists make up 2 percent of the vehicles on the road and 10 percent of the fatalities, and they would be correct. That sounds like a major problem. But what they don't tell you paints a very different scenario.
Sound off about motorcycle safety in our discussion forum. Share your motorcycle accident experiences and tell us whether you think wearing helmets should be required by law. You also can create your own discussion topics.
Tip: Use the back button or links within the forum to return to this report.
Advertisement